Feds Getting Heavy on I-9 Enforcement: So Dot Those I's and Cross Those T's

I have written several times on the new emphasis that the Feds, specifically the USDOL, the EEOC, the OFCCP, and ICE of Homeland Security, are putting on clamping down on employers. Well I picked up my copy of HRMagazine today and read the column "Federal Enforcers Wield Big Sticks". Writer Beth Mirza provides more ammunition to what I have been saying. She is talking in particular about the I-9 form. She quotes attorney Mary Pivec, of Keller and Heckman LLP as saying employers are "carrying extreme liability" in their I-9 forms because aggressive agents are "looking for people to prosecute."

According to Mirza and Pivec the volume of I-9 audits will be stepped up considerably in 2010 and , get this, THEY ARE NOT SEEKING CIVIL REMEDIES, THEY USING CRIMINAL ENFORCEMENT AGAINST EMPLOYERS! This means business owners can have their PERSONAL PROPERTY SEIZED and middle managers (aka HR) can be charged with THE FELONIES OF CONSPIRACY AND HARBORING.

That is not the only arena. Wage and Hour class action suits are on the rise, OSHA is getting very aggressive and seeking criminal remedies and a friend told me today that federal contractors are now being told by the OFCCP that the will be found guilty of discrimination if they source candidates through social media sites since the majority of social media users are white. I have not confirmed the last bit of information, but I will let you know if I do. But the other stuff is fact.

So your HOUSE had better be in order! Unless you think you look good in an orange or blue jumpsuit.

OSHA: "A New Sheriff In Town"

In a speech to the American Bar Association in March 2010, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occuaptional Safety and Health, David Michaels said "I know that by now you've all heard Secretary Solis describe DOL under this Administration as the "new sheriff in town." This is not an abstract wish; it is a stern description of how OSHA is now working - and I take this phrase seriously."


OSHA has taken a much more intense and "gonna get you" approach to dealing with employers. Michaels went on to further comment "First and foremost, we will emphasize strong enforcement - as evidenced in our record-breaking $84.7 million citation against BP Texas City, and the sharp increase in our egregious cases." He then added "If the threat of a fine isn't enough, we have other ways to drive home the point that employers need to obey the law." (My emphasis). To emphasis the point he stated "...we conducted the first-ever vehicle seizure in an OSHA whistleblower case..."
 
According to attorneys at Seyfarth Shaw much of what OSHA administers may now have criminal implications. Injuries may now be indictable and employer representatives and executives may now be subject to criminal prosecution. They number of citations will be stepped up in the "willful" catagories and fines will be increased substantially.
 
A company's liability under the Multi-employer Workplace Doctrine will increase. As an employer using outside contracting companies in your facility you will now be responsible for the safety training of those employees. Failure to provide this training is a violation and may be deemed a willful violation.
 
The general duty clause will take on broader meaning to allow OSHA to cover anything not specifically covered in the regulations. Ergonomics will become a bigger issue.
 
Michael's further states in his speech.. So, you can expect to see us moving, to the extent we can, toward higher penalties, not only to send a message to those employers who neglect their workplace responsibilities, but also to those employers who need reminding that a safe workplace is not something to think about only when it's convenient - when you have the time and money - but every day."
 
So, are you feeling that target on your back getting bigger?
 
Tomorrow I will conclude the week with some tips on what you can do to prevent or mitigate a visit from an OSHA inspector.